Prepayment review operations

CMS FY2024: $31.1B improper payments (5.09% rate). 84.3M beneficiaries · $931.7B expenditure. Modeled prevention targets.

81.8K

$169,217

12

47/hr

$450 flagged exposure per analyst hour (modeled)

Illustrative National Impact Scenario

CMS FY2024 savings estimate. Modeled.

Modeled scenario estimate

Value
$1.6B–$2.4B
Basis
Modeled from CMS FY2024 rate applied to national Medicaid expenditure

Potentially adaptable state Medicaid programs

Value
50
Basis
State Medicaid programs under CMS oversight (42 CFR Part 430)

1.2B claims modeled at national scale

Value
1.2B
Basis
Annual evaluation capacity benchmarked to CMS T-MSIS volume. Modeled.

Modeled routing performance target

Value
94.3%
Note
Modeled target. Not a validated performance measure.
Basis
Modeled target. Not a validated performance measure.

Operational Analytics

Claims evaluation volume, national cohort.

Claims evaluated by month

Methodology

Claims volume modeled on CMS T-MSIS national Medicaid reporting parameters

Framework Impact Summary

ROI indicators for policy review.

Framework ROI

$1,410/ FTE-month

Prepayment vs. recovery shift

68% earlier intervention

Disposition documentation rate

99.2%

Regulatory Alignment

Federal program integrity authorities.

CMS Center for Program Integrity

Designed with reference to publicly documented Medicaid program integrity priorities. Prepayment review, audit trails, and program integrity reporting concepts. No CMS, OIG, MFCU, or state agency endorsement implied.

Designed with reference to OIG Medicaid oversight priorities

Methodologies mapped to federal Medicaid program integrity priorities and oversight focus areas. No CMS, OIG, MFCU, or state agency endorsement implied.

Designed to align with 42 CFR Part 455 program integrity concepts

Federal Medicaid provider screening and claims integrity regulatory structure.

HIPAA Data Handling Standards

Role-based access, encryption, minimum-necessary data for PHI-adjacent operations.

Program integrity reporting concept

Structured for state MIP-style reporting, corrective-action tracking, and federal reconciliation concepts. No CMS, OIG, MFCU, or state agency endorsement implied.

MFCU referral package preparation concept

Referral pathways and case packages structured for MFCU coordination and program integrity review handoff. No CMS, OIG, MFCU, or state agency endorsement implied.

Performance Indicators

Operational metrics, national deployment.

Claims evaluated

81.8K

Routed for analyst review

847

Estimated prepayment exposure

$169,217

Avg routing time

2.4 hrs

Deployment Readiness Modeling

Jurisdiction readiness · MedIntegrity OS

State readiness grid

1

2

2

46

NY
CA
TX
FL
IL
PA
OH
GA
NC
MI
NJ
VA
WA
AZ
MA
TN
IN
MO
MD
WI
CO
MN
SC
AL
LA
KY
OR
OK
CT
UT
IA
NV
AR
MS
KS
NM
NE
ID
WV
HI
NH
ME
MT
RI
DE
SD
ND
AK
VT
WY
DC
  • Modeled: Fully configured demonstration scenario
  • Pilot-readiness: Pilot-readiness model: illustrative scenario for limited-scope supervised review
  • Configured: Framework configured. Pending analyst onboarding.
  • Pending: Available for deployment. No MMIS connection in this environment.

Illustrative deployment readiness scenarios. No live state MMIS connections.

Signal Feed

Risk stratified queue. Disposition required.

Last updated: